CO129-264 - Governor Sir Robinson & Public Offices - 1894 [9-12] — Page 508

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

593

submit that while I admit that certain

things happened and certain mistakes

were made, I do not admit that there

was a lack of culpable negligence or carelessness on

my part, and I allege matter in extenuation.

First,

As to charge 1, it was, I submit, at most, a

charge that I was guilty of an error of judgment in

not sending for the clerks off duty to help with the work.

When I found that I was unable to get the work done in time,

it was too late to send for them. There is no wilful fault here.

As to charge 3, I do not say that the facts alleged did not occur.

I only say that there was no culpable negligence on my part,

and I have no recollection of the event or explanation at the time.

As to charge 4, the facts are as I stated them.

In conclusion, I beg respectfully to submit that although I have served

for a considerable period under Mr. Travers before he went on leave,

he makes no complaint against me as to that past time;

on the contrary, he has repeatedly reported very favourably on all his staff.

The faults I am now charged with were not faults of wilful negligence

or carelessness or ignorance of my duties, but had their main cause

in a state of affairs in the Post Office for which I was not to blame.

If these faults are now overlooked, the Government will find that under

Mr. Travers' management, I will be able to render as good and as efficient

service as ever, and that there will be no such blunders in the Post Office in the future.

For: J. St. S. Lockhart,

Act. Colonial Secretary.

I have read: Sq. F. A. Barradas.

Edit History

2026-05-27 18:17:34 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
submit that while I admit that certainthings happened and certain mistakeswere made, I do not admit that therewas a lack of culpable negligence or carelessness onmy part, and I allege matter in extenuation.First,As to charge 1, it was, I submit, at most, acharge that I was guilty of an error of judgment innot sending for the clerks off duty to help with the work.When I found that I was unable to get the work done in time,it was too late to send for them. There is no wilful fault here.As to charge 3, I do not say that the facts alleged did not occur.I only say that there was no culpable negligence on my part,and I have no recollection of the event or explanation at the time.As to charge 4, the facts are as I stated them.In conclusion, I beg respectfully to submit that although I have servedfor a considerable period under Mr. Travers before he went on leave,he makes no complaint against me as to that past time;on the contrary, he has repeatedly reported very favourably on all his staff.The faults I am now charged with were not faults of wilful negligenceor carelessness or ignorance of my duties, but had their main causein a state of affairs in the Post Office for which I was not to blame.If these faults are now overlooked, the Government will find that underMr. Travers' management, I will be able to render as good and as efficientservice as ever, and that there will be no such blunders in the Post Office in the future.For: J. St. S. Lockhart,Act. Colonial Secretary.I have read: Sq. F. A. Barradas.
Baseline (Original)
submit that while I admit that certainthings happened and certain mistakeswere made, I do not admit that therewas a Lnessanyarrculḥablece or careless. negligence my part, and I allege matter in extenuation.first,سلاحAs to charge I it was, abcharge of wilful negligence inn the despatch of the "Verona ". Now,aappears from Mr. Travers minute,it is, at most, acharge that I was an error of judgment inguilty ofnot sending for the clerks off duty to help with the work.When I found that I was unable to get the work done in time,it was too late to send for any wilful fault here.one. Thereis,I submit,tto 3, I do not sayAs 10charge 3, that the facts allegedare not huthator did not occur.I only say cart there was no and I have no recollection.event.explaint at the timeareAs to charge 4 the facts as as I stated them.In conclusion I begu. sst respectfully to submit that although I have servedfor a considerable period under Mr Travers before he went on leave,hecomplaint against makes no me as to that fast time thaton the contrary, he has repeatedly reported very favourably of all his staff; that the faults I am now charged with were not faults of wilful negligencesance ofor carelessness or iguo- but had their mainduties,my causein a state of affairs in the Post Office for which I was not to blame; that if these faults are now overlooked the Government will find that underMr. Travers management I will be able to render as good and as efficientservice as ever and that there will be no such blunders in the Post Office in the future.ofthefor: J. St. S. Lockhart,AsAct. Colonial Sevesory.I have re Sq. F. A. Barradas.
2026-05-27 18:17:34 · Baseline
View content

593

submit that while I admit that certain

things happened and certain mistakes

were made, I do not admit that there

was a L

ness

any

arr

culḥable

ce or careless.

negligence

my part, and I allege

matter in extenuation.

first,

سلاح

As to

charge

I it was,

ab

charge of wilful negligence inn the despatch of the "Verona ". Now,

a

appears from Mr. Travers minute,

it is, at most, a

charge

that I was

an error of judgment in guilty of not sending for the clerks off duty to help with the work. When I found

that I was unable to

get the work

done in time, it was too late to send

for any wilful fault here.

one. There

is,

I submit,

tto

3, I do not say

As 10

charge 3,

that the facts alleged

are not hu

that

or did not occur. I only say

cart

there was no and I have no recollection.

event.

explaint at the time

are

As to charge 4 the facts as

as I stated them.

In conclusion I begu. sst respectfully to submit that although I have served for a considerable period under Mr Travers before he went on leave, he

complaint against

makes no

me as to

that fast time that on the contrary, he has repeatedly reported very favourably of all his staff; that the faults I am

now

charged with were not faults of wilful negligence

sance of

or carelessness or

iguo-

but had their main

duties,

my cause in a state of affairs in the Post Office for which I was not to blame; that if these faults are now overlooked the Government will find that under Mr. Travers management I will be

able to render as

good and as efficient service as ever and that there will be no such blunders in the Post Office in the future.

of

the

for: J. St. S. Lockhart,

As

Act. Colonial Sevesory.

I have re

Sq. F. A. Barradas.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.